Abstract:
The author addresses the question of whether penta is different when the setting changes. Using the methodology of consciential constructivism, proposed by the author at the 2nd International Symposium on Conscientiological Research, the article’s objective is to offer a preliminary analysis, outlining areas of similarity and difference. It also raises questions for further research for both international and Brazil-based penta practitioners.
Description:
When first invited to speak on the international panel at this VII Fórum da Tenepes, the natural question arose: is penta different in an international setting? Having an international panel in some ways presupposes that some differences must exist. And if so, what are they? The objective of the article is to answer this question while also examining how this could be analyzed, including examining whether I was holding any
assumptions on the matter and, finally, to outline the results of my analysis.
